September 26, 2025
The latest EHCP data makes for sobering reading. In 2024/25, 5.3% of school-aged children in England had an EHCP – up from 3.3% just five years ago. In the North West, that figure climbs to 6.4%. In some areas, like Liverpool, the rate has more than doubled since 2019.
This isn’t a blip. It’s a structural surge in demand that SEND teams were never designed to handle. And the consequences are everywhere: staff burning out, families waiting months, and councils facing eye-watering overspends.
Let’s be clear – most SEND teams are doing heroic work under impossible conditions. But the system is showing cracks that can’t be ignored:
Without radical change, the outcomes are inevitable: longer waits, more legal breaches, declining trust, and even bigger holes in already stretched budgets.
The instinct in public services is often to look for incremental fixes. But in the face of data like this, tinkering at the edges simply won’t do.
We need intelligent, scalable tools that directly cut through the bottlenecks – and that’s where EHCP Plus comes in.
This isn’t theory. Councils are already proving what’s possible:
The result? More time for co-production, quality assurance, annual reviews, and transition planning – the real work that changes lives.
Founders of EHCP Plus have set themselves a mission: to save 50,000 days of caseworker time. That’s not a nice-to-have – it’s a necessity if councils are to have any chance of meeting rising demand without breaking their workforce.
Councils that act now can:
Those that delay adoption face the opposite: worsening deficits, more appeals, and reputational damage that will be hard to recover from.
The data leaves no room for complacency. EHCP demand will continue to rise. Staffing pipelines won’t magically fix themselves. And the cost of failure – financial, social, and human – is already too high.
Intelligent tools like EHCP Plus are not about replacing people – they’re about giving professionals the time and headspace to do their jobs properly.
The question for local authority leaders isn’t whether you can afford to innovate. It’s whether you can afford not to.